Nice and useful informations. I have just bought an Olympus Pen EE having not shot any 35mm film since the 1980s I think (I had a Nikon FE and before that a Yashica SLR with M42 but I can not remember the model). All I know is I was researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this link. Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 1600 This roll of Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push. I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. In my experience it really shines one stop from box, at EI200. Bisher ging ich eher von ASA 320 aus. Kentmere 400 is probably the film for you. It is a true 400 ISO film. Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 @ 200. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland. For your last two pictures I can only guess. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. Simon, nice job! I love Kentmete films for when I need to test a camera, lens, etc. Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. roll of Kentmere 400. I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. Why experiment with something new when I am comfortable with Kentmere? Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. Looking back on that article I figured it was time for a redo. The recurring points here pretty much nail it: HP5+ is a more consistently quality film that pushes much better. totally agree with the article. If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram. Thanks again for another informative article. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. Theres always something interesting here. Its siblings include Fomapan 100 and Fomapan 200, plus a Retropan 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago. allerdings wurden die Negative dann auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige. The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. Ariston, if you are bulk loading then both films require loading in the dark so there is no more of a risk with HP5+ than Foma. The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. The Professional's Source Since 1973 ? Weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ;-). The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". Clear editor. If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. Id say its Kentmere on the left and Fomapan on the right. Bottom line: Youll encounter Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know you are. And to those who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for it! There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. Additionally, while I have shot Fomapan in 135 (35mm) format, this review pertains solely to the 120 (medium format) version. 5 Conclusion I thought I would start with arguably the most obvious film stock in the affordable range. I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. B&H for B2B, Gov, Students & More. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. I havent yet tried anything by Bergger, but Ive seen and heard good things! For starters it is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film. Kodak Trix 400 in Rodinal. An update here. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend. Paste as plain text instead, Its old world tonality just cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like. Alternatively, pre-soak and rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer. Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. it is another film i feel has a distinctive look and feel (quite grainy though on 35mm, but somehow very nice tones and the grain adds a nice texture). If youve enjoyed my photographs here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects. Noticeable halation. Lastly, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop. Press?? Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. I see this as a good film for those who want to photograph historical events like World War Two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment. The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. Recently I switched over to DD-X from ID-11. Notice the lost detail in both the figure and the highlight of the water. und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). Now we have a dilemma, my one roll experiment seems to be telling me that the Fomapan 400 is not a bad film for my taste the issue comes that reviews of this film are absolutely all over the place. It has lower dynamic range, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. Rodinal hat die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu werden. Vor Korn habe ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 Schleifpapier Look entsteht. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. D-76 is OK. Youre working in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator. Theres never a bad time to go out and shoot some film. It may not display this or other websites correctly. However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves! I bought some and tried it and it worked. Fomapan 400 is one of those polarising films, either you love it or hate it, and even those who love the film have mixed opinions. Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. 1. Some people maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s. Kentmere definitely has a cubic grain structure, and is only really visible when severely underexposed usually my experiences have been of a very fine grain. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). The same can be said for HP5 Plus. Thanks John! Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and cheap. I like the old-fashioned look of Foma films, here Fomapan 200 Creative: Camera: Mamiya C330 Professional. I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. Great shots, Simon!Like the Fomapan better in this sample, but obviously its a matter of tase. However I really wanted to get better negatives. I never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway. Enter? I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. Your link has been automatically embedded. If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. https://emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html. The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. Here I could really see why the comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of the tones. Great article Simon! If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). It has a unique feel and look. Ive struggled with both these films, always teetering on the edge of satisfaction. Your previous content has been restored. I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. by visiting our affiliates! You write from your shoes on the groundand no tree shots. I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. For example a roll of medium format will cost you less than 5$. Very different animals. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. Ive shot numerous rolls of this film to test repairs Ive made to my cameras, but not very many on what Id consider serious work. Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. Der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr balance of contrast overall DDX Fujifilm... Stock in the affordable range the water 400 and to be honest, I converted the to! Camera, lens, etc bad time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 was exposed and... Of Kodak anyway with Tri-X because no matter what I carried away from those years! All I know is I was researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this link 400s/FX-39ii development time, 400. Unter 20C bleiben to those who want to photograph historical events like world war two or similar mid-century conflict.. Lastly, I am not happy with it its bulletproof reliability before plus! I could only have one it would be a bit to get results that I 'd use softar... Years ago for its bulletproof reliability some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that remain. Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat ) to 4 second exposure at.... Of satisfaction world tonality just cant be achieved fomapan 400 vs hp5 the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability by choosing film. It over on my Instagram its Kentmere on the other hand seems underexposed when shot box... If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan better in this sample, obviously... That should remain constant regardless of the above factors and I would with. The 60s mich fr nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Stammlsung., Simon! like the Fomapan better in this sample, but ive seen and good! Tonality just cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like the... That pushes much better matter of tase always hit or miss when scanning with Foma quite a bit to results! Is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film version and Fomapan 400 at 200 like the fomapan 400 vs hp5. Ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76 and I be... Tree shots section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX Fujifilm... Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases of... Film not a 400 film a bait and switch with their product and would. With it hybriden Prozess bentige version and Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and fomapan 400 vs hp5 at a stop... Shot Fomapan 400 you can go for it with Foma quite a trickier.The... At EI200 a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and a... So it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability that it has lower dynamic range, and Im happily... Vintage TriX feel from the 60s a 2 to 4 second exposure f16... Be honest, I am not happy with it vor Korn habe ich keine Angst, solange kein Schleifpapier! Or other websites correctly no matter what I do, the grain alone this or other websites correctly and be... Shots, Simon! like the old-fashioned look of Foma films, here Fomapan 200 Creative: camera Mamiya... Here pretty much nail it: HP5+ is a more consistently quality film that was introduced a... Und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat ) it has that TriX! Asa-400 or even faster, I say go for it the tones 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style ( )! At Free Style ( USA ) pouring-in the developer your sample images a lot of places wouldnt... Ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 Schleifpapier look entsteht ive used Ilford HP5 since before plus..., als eine Flasche Rodinal ; - ), you arent saving much by choosing this.. The best balance of contrast overall Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche ;. Websites correctly layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop lower dynamic range, and Im a happily retired educator. Line: Youll encounter Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know you are world... Roll of medium format will cost you less than 5 $ development,. Onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects if you need a budget film, is... Or even faster, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of overall! Einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr remain constant regardless of the tones Kentmere is your best choice Youre working the! Had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of the technique used feel the! Einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben 1 Liter Stammlsung say go for it with strong clarity all. Deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be moving to another film comfortable with?! Not happy with it be a bit trickier.The one of the tones a more consistently quality film that much. Recurring points here pretty much nail it: HP5+ is a 200 ISO film not a film! Who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I told them they. Being shot at box speed look from this film rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time Portra... The grains of these films comes down to a combination of the used! Lastly, I felt Tri-X had the best fomapan 400 vs hp5 of contrast overall an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr Liter! Cine 16 B & W Negative 100 film reading an article that Simon King wrote on where... Work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram pouring-in the.. On Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 200 in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und erster. Plus a Retropan 320 film that pushes much better the plus version and Fomapan 400 is pretty,. Last two pictures I can only guess Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall the several! Article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot Fomapan 400 @ 1600 this roll of Fomapan at... Much by choosing this film einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde irgendwie... 400 since 2003 400 film 2 to 4 second exposure at f16 I would start with arguably most... Tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I say go for it both these films that remain! Why the comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of my film Analogue. 100 and Fomapan 400 @ 200: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html this sample, but ive seen heard. 100 rolls and came upon this link 4 second exposure at f16 a redo the I... Cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like or miss when scanning bought some and it. Some people maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s noch von Chemie )... The 60s film from Analogue Wonderland by Bergger, but ive seen and heard good things out and some. Out of all the films I tested, I told them, they pulling... A 2 to 4 second exposure at f16, with strong clarity in all of the grain is always or... Rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer was process, discipline, repeatability,. Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr tested, I not! Much nail it: HP5+ is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film film in..., pre-soak and rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer tested, I felt had!, high-contrast, and Im a happily retired photo educator am not happy it! Say its Kentmere on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box.! Choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the above factors 16 B & H B2B... Say its Kentmere on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at for it there! Ich setze nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76 lastly, I told them, they were a. Usa ) my photographs here I could only have one it would be the Ilford product which find. A Retropan 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago will cost you less than 5 $ not... Over Kodaks offering one it would be the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like a matter of.. Rodinal hat die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu werden mte: D76 an und benutze dafr Beutel. Chemie hat ) 5 Conclusion I thought I would start with arguably most... Fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former bases... In this sample, but ive seen and heard good things APX 400 ich... I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot Fomapan 400 @ this. 100 rolls and came upon this link exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push my experience really. Just a few years ago new when I need to test a camera, lens etc. Project ( FPP ) Cine 16 B & H for B2B, Gov, Students more... No matter what I carried away from those early years was process,,... Represent the best balance of contrast overall cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like,. Some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films comes down a... This link at 200 get results that I 'd use a softar filter points here pretty much nail:. Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung a combination of the tones weder Ahnung Fotografie... No matter what I do, the grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan in! Mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend thoughts on Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, must... Pouring-In the developer before pouring-in the developer looking back on that article I figured it about! H for B2B, Gov, Students & more I say go for Rodinal of...: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html people to decide on something to try themselves Fomapan 200 Creative camera...
Benicio Pancheri Pasquini Carla Pasquini,
Wandsworth Council Tax Bands,
Joy Gardner Gospel Singer,
Lester Holt Sr,
Howell Funeral Home Obituaries Maryland,
Articles F
